Old Testament Parables: A Different Kind of Story
While Jesus’ parables often revealed mysteries of the Kingdom, the Old Testament contains a unique collection of parables, often serving as prophetic warnings or political allegories. One such parable is Jotham’s Parable of the Trees Choosing a King in Judges 9:7-15. Unlike Jesus’ parables, which were designed to reveal truth to the faithful while concealing it from the hardened, Jotham’s parable was a public denunciation of corruption and a direct warning of coming disaster.
This parable was spoken at a pivotal moment in Israel’s history, when the people were moving away from their reliance on God’s direct rule and beginning to seek earthly rulers to govern them. The setting was one of treachery, murder, and political ambition, as Abimelek seized power through deception and violence. Jotham, the only surviving son of Gideon (Jerubbaal), delivers this parable as an indictment against Abimelek and the leaders of Shechem, exposing their foolishness in choosing a wicked ruler over men of true worth.
Words: 1250 / Time to read: 7 minutes
The Parable of the Trees Choosing a King (Judges 9:7-15)
Jotham’s parable takes place after one of the most brutal political coups in Israel’s history. Abimelek, the son of Gideon by a concubine, slaughtered his seventy brothers to eliminate competition and secured the throne of Shechem by manipulating the people into crowning him king (Judges 9:1-6).
Upon hearing of Abimelek’s coronation, Jotham stands atop Mount Gerizim and delivers a prophetic warning in the form of a parable:
“One day the trees went out to anoint a king for themselves. They said to the olive tree, ‘Be our king.’ But the olive tree answered, ‘Should I give up my oil, by which both gods and humans are honored, to hold sway over the trees?’
Next, the trees said to the fig tree, ‘Come and be our king.’ But the fig tree replied, ‘Should I give up my fruit, so good and sweet, to hold sway over the trees?’
Then the trees said to the vine, ‘Come and be our king.’ But the vine answered, ‘Should I give up my wine, which cheers both gods and humans, to hold sway over the trees?’
Finally, all the trees said to the thornbush, ‘Come and be our king.’ The thornbush said to the trees, ‘If you really want to anoint me king over you, come and take refuge in my shade; but if not, then let fire come out of the thornbush and consume the cedars of Lebanon!’” (Judges 9:8-15)
Cultural and Historical Context
The Era of the Judges and Israel’s Political Instability
The Book of Judges describes one of the darkest periods in Israel’s history—a time when there was no centralized leadership, and the people repeatedly fell into idolatry, oppression, and social chaos. Instead of remaining faithful to God as their King, they longed for a human ruler who would bring security and stability.
After Gideon’s successful military leadership, the Israelites began desiring a monarchy—a shift that would later culminate in Israel’s rejection of God’s direct rule in favor of Saul (1 Samuel 8:6-9). However, rather than seeking a righteous leader, the people of Shechem chose Abimelek, a ruthless and self-serving ruler.
The Symbolism of the Trees and Their Choice of King
Jotham’s use of tree imagery would have been highly relatable to an agrarian society like Israel. The three trees in the parable—the olive tree, fig tree, and vine—represent fruitful, valuable members of society who reject the call to kingship because they are already fulfilling their God-given purpose.
- The Olive Tree – Produces oil, a symbol of anointing, honor, and spiritual significance.
- The Fig Tree – Bears sweet and nourishing fruit, providing sustenance and stability.
- The Vine – Yields wine, bringing joy and celebration.
Each tree represents noble leadership, refusing kingship not out of cowardice, but because their true purpose was more valuable than ruling for personal gain.
In contrast, the Thornbush (Bramble) gladly accepts the offer, despite its worthlessness. Unlike the fruitful trees, the bramble is a destructive, thorny plant that provides no real shade and is known for fueling wildfires. This represents Abimelek, a leader who had nothing to offer but deceit and destruction.
Explanation of the Parable and Its Effectiveness
1. The Foolishness of Shechem’s Decision
Jotham’s parable exposes the absurdity of the people rejecting noble leadership (represented by the fruit-bearing trees) and embracing an unworthy ruler (the Thornbush).
Shechem’s leaders chose Abimelek, not because of his character, but because of his local ties and their own personal gain. However, just as the Thornbush offered false promises of shade, Abimelek would ultimately turn on the people who empowered him, leading to their destruction (Judges 9:46-49).
2. The Destructive Nature of Self-Serving Leaders
The Thornbush’s final warning—that fire will come from it and consume the cedars of Lebanon—is a prophetic prediction that Abimelek’s reign would end in fire and destruction. Indeed, later in Judges 9, Abimelek and Shechem destroy each other in civil war.
The lesson is clear: Wicked leaders not only fail their people but ultimately bring destruction upon themselves.
Theological and Dispensational Implications
From a dispensational perspective, this parable highlights Israel’s tendency to reject God’s rule and choose corrupt leaders. This pattern repeats throughout Israel’s history:
- The People Reject God’s Leadership – Just as Shechem chose Abimelek, Israel later demanded a human king instead of trusting God (1 Samuel 8:6-8).
- The Rise of Self-Serving Leaders – Many of Israel’s kings, from Saul to Ahab to Zedekiah, were self-centered rulers who led the nation into sin.
- Judgment Falls on Corrupt Leadership – Just as Abimelek and Shechem destroyed each other, Israel repeatedly faced divine judgment for following unrighteous leaders.
This passage also provides a foreshadowing of the Antichrist, who, like Abimelek, will rise to power through deception and false promises (Daniel 9:27; 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4) but will ultimately face divine judgment.
Summary and Conclusion
Jotham’s Parable of the Trees Choosing a King is one of the most profound political allegories in the Bible. Through vivid and relatable imagery, he exposes the folly of choosing leaders based on self-interest rather than godly character.
- The Olive Tree, Fig Tree, and Vine symbolize wise, productive leaders who serve God’s purpose.
- The Thornbush (Bramble) represents Abimelek, a ruler who promised much but ultimately led to destruction.
- The parable serves as both a critique and a prophecy, warning Shechem that their decision would lead to their downfall—which was fulfilled in Judges 9:22-57.
For modern readers, this parable remains a timeless warning:
- Leadership matters—choosing corrupt, self-serving rulers leads to disaster.
- God holds leaders accountable, ensuring that wickedness does not go unpunished.
- True leadership is about serving others, not seizing power for personal gain.
Ultimately, this passage affirms God’s sovereignty over rulers and nations, reminding us that the only true, righteous King is Christ, the One who leads with justice and truth.
“The Lord reigns forever; he has established his throne for judgment. He rules the world in righteousness and judges the peoples with equity.” (Psalm 9:7-8)
All Scripture quoted from:
New International Version (NIV)
Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.